Monday, July 30, 2012

PROPHECIES JESUS CHRIST MADE THE BLIND CHRISTIANS AND THEIR SCHOLARS NEVER NOTICED! From Erasmus of America July 30, 2012


    Matthew 24:44-47: Therefore, be ye also ready: for in such an hour as ye think not the Son of man (Jesus) cometh. Who then is a faithful and wise servant, whom his lord ( Jesus) hath made ruler over his household, to give them meat in due season? Blessed is that servant, (chief steward of Jesus Christ), whom his lord (Jesus) when he cometh shall find so doing. (Chief Steward of Jesus Christ when he appears is secret sign for Christians that Jesus is coming soon! Read it folks!). Verily I(Jesus) say unto you, that he (Jesus) shall make him ruler (chief steward - right hand of Jesus - prime minister to Jesus as Jesus states in Revelation) over all his (Christ's) goods."
     St. Luke 12:42-44: "Who is that faith and wise steward, whom his lord shall make ruler over his household, to give them their portion of meat in due season? Blessed is that servant, whom his lord when he cometh shall find so doing. Of a truth I(Jesus) say unto you, that he(Jesus) will make him ruler over all that he (Jesus) hath."
     Revelation 2:26: "And he that overcometh, and keepeth my works (early Apostolic Christianity) unto the end(means Chief Steward is there just before return of Jesus), to him I(Jesus) will give power (authority of prime minister of Jesus Christ) over the nations." Rev. 2:28: And I (Jesus) will give him (the one willing to be Chief Steward to Jesus) the morning star.: Rev. 22:16: "I Jesus...am the root and offspring of David, and the bright and morning star."
     Matthew 25:10: "and they that were ready went in with him (Jesus) to the marriage: and the door was shut." Matthew 11:13 "Afterward came also the other virgins (symbol for Christians as used by Jesus) saying, Lord (Jesus), Lord (Jesus), open to us. But he (Jesus answered, and said, Verily i say unto you, I know you not. (This according to first Christianity would be spoken at the hidden site for the Garden of Eden also called Paradise still on earth and the entrance to it according to the Old Testament hidden by the Holy Mountain of God Satan was expelled from). "Watch therefore, for ye know neither the day nor the hour wherein the Son of Man (Jesus) cometh."
     Revelation 12: the dragon empire (Nazi Germany) warns against the wilderness (America. Wilderness was common term of first colonists for North America.) The remnant of real Christianity (the woman ) hides in this wilderness for 1,260 days until Nazi Germany is defeated. As Pres. Roosevelt explained to the American people in a "fireside chat" on Dec. 8, 1941 the day after the attack on Pearl Harbor, Nazi Germany ordered Imperial Japan to attack Pearl Harbor as the price of military alliance with Nazi Germany. The Japanese Imperial Fleet left port to begin its attack on Pearl Harbor on Nov. 26, but Nov. 25 Washington time, 1941,  Under military law, Nazi Germany by ordering the attack on Pearl Harbor began the war on Nov. 25, though the attack did not hit Pearl Harbor until Dec. 7. Nazi Germany surrendered to Gen. Eisenhower on May 7, 1945 exactly 1,260 days later as prophesied in Chapter 12 of Revelation. On the Friday evening before Pentecost just before I was 7 years old, what three adults said was the cloven tongues of fire of the Holy Ghost appeared over me and I then knew this explanation for Revelation even though as a small boy then, I had never read the Bible and was still an atheist until 10 1/2 years old. Christians savagely attacked the three prominent American adults who told others about what they had seen. One was a Catholic and won the award for being the top architect in America one year. His wife was Methodist and one of the richest women in America. The third was a prominent socialite and my mother. The American Christians charged the three must have been liars, drunk, on dope, or crazy to claim see the cloven tongues of fire appear over me when just before 7 years old. And surprise, I remember most of what happened but not all that night. The adults filled me in with that small amount I did not remember and the married couple asked me later in military school if I remembered this incident. I said yes I did remember it. They said they felt this was a sign of God that I was destined to be a great champion of Christianity later on in America. My mother who was about to become a Catholic convert felt this sign was for her, not me. I never saw her logic on that point as I received all this knowledge of the Book of Revelation which I had never read in my life at that time. And what I learned then when I was older in age was all verified as historically correct. And let me state bluntly what I learned then by revelation I judge of God is that Wash., D.C. is the most evil government in human history having as my earlier report charged with laughter murdered over 3 billion or more people on earth in the 20th century and thought this a hilarious joke before God whose face Wash., D.C. under Obama fiercely spits in the face of God this very hour!
     Any man or woman who dares vote for or support Obama is supporting the man who in his heart wants to be the Antichrist to kill off all the Jews on earth and kill off all the Christians who do not renounce their faith in Christ. At just before 7 years of age, I did not understand this then but understood that I was in Revelation and the future champion of Apostolic Christianity the churches give lip service to, but carefully avoid supporting too strongly.
     I will give a brief display of knowledge of early Apostolic Christianity the churches and their scholars do not know. Then you decide if you want to support the serious revival of Apostolic Christianity in America and the world, or else shadowbox with evil and when the wise virgin Christains are taken by Jesus into Paradise (early Christianity said where Jesus intended to house them for the prophesied world Tribulation), as St. Jerome who translated the Vulgate version of the Bible around 400 A.D. and top scholar in the Roman Empire then on early Christian writings, twice wrote the foolish virgin Christians will be kicked out by Jesus to face the Antichrist on earth and in utter terror they will flee for their lives across the earth. The wise virgin Christians will be safe with Jesus during the Tribulation and come back out after the Antichrist is crushed by Jesus, and they take over rulership and management of the earth after the evil are purged from the earth by Jesus Christ. How the wise virgin Christians get to be with Jesus during the Tribulation was not really stated by the first Christian writers. Whether by a rapture, a mass migration or other means, they end up at the right location so the Antichrist and all hell on earth is not their problem!
     Most Protestant and Catholic scholars judge Jesus was born 5 B.C. or earlier. They are wrong! Early Christianity wrote that Jesus was born 28 years after the death of Cleopatra of Egypt in 30 B.C. Jesus was born in the 42nd year of the reign of Augustus Caesar. Our Christian scholars of today thought how dumb the early Christian writers were to write such a ridiculous statement in their eyes. I took three years of Latin which included a lot of Roman history while in military school. Octavian Caesar,stepson of Julius Caesar, considered it very smart to list the beginning of his reign from the reading of the Will of Julius Caesar just after he had been murdered in 44 B.C. Subtract 42 years and we end up with the same year as the death of Cleopatra of Egypt reference leads to the birth of Jesus Christ. Of course, Octavian Caesar changed his name to Augustus Caesar and because of the will of Julius Caesar was later able to have the Roman Senate declare him a god of the Roman Empire. I knew how ancient Roman culture worked. The modern Christian scholars so arrogant and dismissing towards the early Christian writers did not know that the modern scholars were the hicks as scholars, not the first ancient scholars of first Apostolic Christianity. The Roman Catholic Church has even said that she does not know the date when Jesus was born. If the sloppy Catholic scholars had seriously read the first writings of Christianity, in the early collection called The Constitutions of the Holy Apostles a Jewish convert to Christianity writes that Jesus was born on the 25th of the ninth month. But modern scholars did not realize he was referring to the Jewish lunar calendar. Its equivalent on the Roman or solar calendar was basically Dec. 25 which was the Jewish holiday of Hanukkah which symbolically means "The Lord dwells among us." I ran across a historical note that the Pharisees judging the Roman calendar was more accurate than the Jewish coordinated their Jewish calendar with the Roman calendar so the Jewish 25th day of the month was the same as the 25th of the Roman calendar. So Jesus Christ was for real born on Hannukah, Dec. 25, and probably 2 B.C. when a formation of planets as I understand it all came together on Dec. 25 and would have shown as a super bright star that night over Bethlehem. Also, the Eastern half of early Christianity used to celebrate the birthday of John the Baptist who was the cousin of Jesus Christ and born 6 months before Jesus according to the New Testament. Add 6 months to the birthday for John the Baptist and we are basically at or very close to Dec. 25. I use common sense in Bible scholarship. Too many do not.
     The Roman Catholic Church knew how to bring defeat from the jaws of victory in some areas. They taught the same doctrine as first Christianity about the bread and water being prayed over becomes by a spiritual mystery the actual flesh and blood of Jesus Christ. They used the fancy word of transubstantiation which had no connection to early Apostolic Christianity and helped break up the unity of Christianity by use of this word. The correct word as early Christianity used 100 years and so after Christ was "transmutation" which is a Latin word meaning changing one substance into another. Look at the famous debate between Justin Martyr and a Jewish scholar around 160 A.D. Justin Martyr referred to this praying over the bread and water as transmutation. Also, the Jewish scholar said the Christians were heretics for worshipping on Sunday instead of Saturday. Justin Martry corrected him that they made Sunday their main day of worship to honor the day that Jesus resurrected from the dead but also worshipped God the other six days also instead of just one day as the Jews did.
     As now both the Protestant and Catholic side suddenly realize, I am a very deadly scholar in what early Apostolic Christianity taught. Jesus was definitely opposed to divorce. However, for the comfort of millions of Christians in America who think they have committed the unforgiveable sin by having divorced their partner in their marriage, Jesus also allowed reasons for divorce. Tertullian Against Marcion around 200 A.D. covered several angles how Christians could be divorced and then remarried, and this not be a sin in the eyes of Jesus Christ. He was one of the most prominent Church Fathers of Early Apostolic Christianity and wrote such as, "Divorce, therefore, when justly deserved, has even in Christ a defender." "He prohibits divorce when He will have the marriage invioolable: He (Jesus) permits when the marriage is spotted with unfaithfulness." Tertullian covered other angles when divorce was permitted such as what the Catholic Church calls "The Pauline Privilege." St. Jerome who translated the Vulgate Bible around 400 A.D. was rated the top scholar on early Christian writings in the Roman Empire. They asked him rather than the Bishop of Rome a powerful question. A very outstanding candidate for Bishop in Spain had been twice married and divorced before becoming a Christian. And now as a Christian, he was married a third time but now as a Christian and with a Christian wife. Could he be allowed to be a Bishop in the Catholic Church with this background? To put it in capsule form, after much study, St. Jerome stated and his judgment became binding on the Catholic Church in the Roman Empire, once baptized a Christian, there was no exception of sin or wrong he could not be forgiven of in the Name of Christ including being married even several times. But now that he was a Christian and married in "the Lord," he should remain the husband of one wife and set the example for all Christians to follow. Yes, he could become a Catholic Bishop and with no sin or moral impediment.
     The early Roman Empire had an abortion drug. The early Christian Church condemned this as murder of the unborn. They ruled for Christianity in 2012 A.D. Epicurus of Greece hundreds of years before Christ taught the Theory of Evolution long before Charles Darwin who merely revived an ancient theory taught in the Roman Empire. Early Christianity condemned the theory of evolution that life evolved from atoms as heresy (religious error) as it denied the Genesis account of the Bible. They successfully discredited the Theory of Evolution back then by arguments such as "Which came first? The bird or the egg? The tree or the seed?" The right answer was God came first as Creator of life and then these cycles of life such as in seed or else eggs got started on earth.
     The New Testament states for Christians to confess their faults before fellow Christians. This grew very embarrasing at times so when great sin was involved, the local pastor was authorized by the local church to act in their name to hear the confession of serious sins and if needed to dictate penance so the sinner stopped this grevious sin. More minor sins were covered by generic public confessions recited by all at the same time in the local church.
     After the Apostles and their first successors appointed the first bishop in any area, the local mother church in the cities were to elect their own bishops meaning overseers. The Church of Rome elected the Bishop of Rome for I think it was a bit over the first 1,000 years and then later ended up with the election by the College of Cardinals.
      Tertullion around 200 A.D. wrote of the ancient Christian custom of making the sign of the cross. Since one of the major denominations called this a "pagan practice" invented by the Catholic Church during the Middle Ages, I expose sloppy Christian scholarship regardless whether Protestant or Catholic side.
     Early Christianity had committees of copyists in their churches. They made copies of the Scriptures so all in their churches could read them when they wanted to and Bible reading was encouraged for all Christians to do. When the Catholic Church tried to forbid Catholics from reading the Bible aroung the time of Martin Luther, they forced the hand of God as God had always had the Christians to use the Bible to expand their knowledge of the teachings of Jesus beyond what was just mentioned in weekly church services. Martin Luther slappped the Catholic Church down for wrong policy, not wrong doctrine, contrary to what early Apostolic Christianity had taught. When Martin Luther went too far and taught that Christians did not have to worry about doing good acts as Christians, he got into hot water with God and early Apostolic Christianity. We are saved by grace of Jesus, but then we do good works from the reborn heart we now have as Christians instead as pagans. As Jesus said the tree that bears no good fruit Jesus will throw away! Is that plain enough?
      I am an economist by training. So this point strongly interested me. I have seen nations in Africa that have 9 children by one woman. This does not take long before the nation has famine, civil war, and other evils occur because the national economy cannot handle this burden of too rapid of population growth. Years ago when living in Wash., D.C., I got ahold of a Jewish reference book on Jewish birth control tactics in Israel 2,000 years ago. They had angles a bit similar to ours and a number of tactics I have not seen in our modern culture. When Jesus lived in the land of Israel, Jesus knew that birth control was widely practiced by the Jews, yet never saw the occasion to denounce it. The Jewish concept was not to deny the God command of "Be fruitful and mutliply," but rather to have responsible parenthood where you wanted children but have them as you could afford to raise them decently as their parents. If Jesus did not condemn this, then neither do I. Some Christian scholars would raise the objection of, "But what about the sin of Onan in Genesis?" He spilled his seed on the ground as the Bible states it, but he had married the wife of his dead brother and in humilation to his pride, he was supposed to by custom raise children in the name of his brother and he not be credited with any sons by marriage. In great anger, he spilled his seed so he could not ever make this wife pregnant his father Judah had ordered him to marry after his brother was killed by the anger of the Lord for being so evil. The Lord then struck him dead because he had no intention of ever raising any children by this wife which would violate the commandment of God "to be fruitful and multiply." The sin as I understand it was the deliberate intention that he would never allow his wife to become pregnant with any children by him. That is the sin here. And two quick points since sex is a tought subject to touch in an article on Apostolic Christianity. Genesis said God made Adam and Eve, not Adam and Steve! Adam and Steve were not designed by God to have sex with each other. Sdam and Eve were! And fornication in the Bible meant to have unlawful sex with foreign flesh. Sex with another outside of marriage was not approved of in either the Old or New Testament. But in the Old Testament, if a man seduced a woman outside of marriage,, then he was honor-bound to marry her to restore her honor as a woman! How I step on toes.!Also, fornication meant marriage was not supposed to be between a member of a race loyal to God to a pagan race, a race which would create the destruction of the culture of your own race based upon the God of the Bible. As Tertullian commented around 200 A.D., you were not supposed to marry a stranger to your God and if in such a marriage, you were allowed to end it by divorce. Similar to the Pauline Privilege taught by the Apostle Paul in the New Testament.
     Tertullium around 200 A.D. wrote how Christian churches were exploding across the Roman Empire. They were generally independently organized and he commented that so long as they taught the same doctrines as the mother churches in the big cities founded by the Apostles, they were also considered equally Apostolic as Christian churches. However, they should strive to join in fellowship with one of the big mother churches in the cities founded by the Apostles once they could.
      As the Treaties of Cyprian (251 A.D.) commented "... He is not joined to the Church who is separate from the Gospel."
     Also, the early Christian churches taught some key teachings from the Old Testament as equally representing the New Testament. Among these would be II Chronicles 15:2: "The Lord is with you while ye be with him:...but if ye forsake him, he will forsake you."
     And as one of the leading Christian Church Fathers commented back in this early era of Christianity, St. John Chrysostom (c. 347-407 A.D.), Bishop of Constantinople, "Nothing so provokes God's anger as the division of the Church."
     Tertullian around 200 A.D. in "Scorpiace" commented on the Last Days as apparently we are living in, "He who had not denied the name of the Lord (meaning True Apostolic Christianity) was delivered from the last trial (world tribulation of the Last Days)."
     Commentaries of Bishop Hippolytus around 212 A.D. or so, "For the soul that is united with Jesus forsakes its faith, it is given over to perpetual death, viz eternal punishment."
     St. Jerome who translated the Vulgate Bible meaning vulgar or common tongue version of the Bible for the Roman Empire once commented, if traditions were passed on in the churches given them by the Apostles of Jesus Christ, then they should honor these traditions in their churches. If later traditions were added to the churches, then the Christians were not honor bound where they had to honor them as binding on them.
     Early Christianity had some toleration for incorrection preaching about Christ. As Phillippians 1:18 taught, Christ is preached rightlty or wrongly, but rejoice for Christ is glorified.
     Tertullian repeated the teaching of the Apostle Paul in Romans that in key areas where essential truths were not sacrified for the sake of unity in the churches, there was plently of room for Christians to have differences of religious views or beliefs. For example, if one wanted to worship on the Lord's Day (Sunday) or else Saturday to observe the old custom of the Sabbath, both could be practiced in Christianity. If one person was a vegetarian and another a meat eater, both would be welcome to attend the same church. In areas that did not challenge fundamental teachings of first Apostolic Christianity, Christians could hold different and opposite beliefs in some areas. In modern terms, the Miracle of the Sun at Fatima in 1917 and message requiring repentance of mankind from mass sin in order to prevent World War II or later World War III, a person did not have to believe later things like this that can not be explained by ordinary means. If a later message is truly from God, it might be smart and bring personal blessings to listen to it. But the Apostolic Christianity delivered us by Christ and the Apostles saved us and we don't need later additions or modifications to be saved by Christ in the Last Days. However, personal comment. Early Christianity said there would be interpreting prophets in the Last Days Christianity. They would not issue new prophecies, but have God-given understanding to understand Bible prophecies of old that could not be understood until the Last Days. For example, Jeremiah 30 predicts the Last Days Community of the elect of God just before the world Tribulation and their governor (founder) would be invited to meet with God while still in the carnal flesh. And he would live because he was invited by God. I think this prophecy refers to the location of the lost city of Enoch rather than Jerusalem because the meeting with God sounds most likely by the Holy Mountain of God mentioned in the Old Testament which is the entrance way to the Garden of Eden also called Paradise. But people never noticed the mention in the Bible that this Mountain of God is by the Garden of Eden. The Garden of Eden never went out of business. It is just hidden from our view like a Space Portal of science fiction put in terms you might understand. I have been over much of the world and I will not say where, but once I visited an area I suspect is the hidden location for the destroyed city of Enoch which would be the oldest city in the world according to Genesis 4. I have a bit of an "Indiana Jones" personality and have successfully cracked already a number of secrets of history. The location of Enoch intrigues me and I found four clues that this might be the City of Enoch destroyed by the Great World Floor. But I will keep secret what I know until the time is right. I have several friends who know what I found and all want to join with me if I go back to the location I found somewhere in the world. The Book of Genesis as I read it pointed a straight arrow to where the lost City of Enoch should be and 4 clues at the site powerfully intrigued me. I may have found another lost city by chance, but I know more than I am going to commit to print. By the way, according to ancient Jewish legend, the largest treasure on the earth should not be too far away from where Enoch is located. But I know more Bible history than most Bible scholars. I am just being frank about this subject.
     One final point and then our visit to Apostolic Christianity must stop here. The Canons of the Fourth Lateran Council, 1215 A.D. which was the largest church council gathering in Christian history up to then ruled that one could be saved outside out of the Church, but not outside of Christ. If validly baptized, you could practice Christianity outside of the formal Church, but you must repent of sins or your baptism will not save you. Also, I think it was clearly understood that if a Church taught you the authentic teachings of Jesus from the Bible, then the Church would be a valuable asset to make you a far better Christian than you could be outside of the official Church.
     Speaking of the True Church, I spent eleven calendar years in military academies and to me it would be illogical for Jesus Christ to found a Church without a central command to it. Early Christianity was heavily governed by councils of bishops elected from their city mother churches. But both the Roman Catholic and Greek Orthodox Catholic admit that Peter was the Bishop of Antioch before going to Rome and joining with Paul to found the powerful Church of Rome. Now Antioch took over the leadership of Christianity in the Middle East after Jerusalem fell to the Roman Army which destroyed much of Jerusalem. This Middle East authority moved upwards until it ended in Constantinople much later on. I recognize both the authority of the Church at Rome and the Church at Constantinople as having come from the Apostle Peter. How I step on toes! Symbolically I ask how Peter of the East could excommunicate Peter of the West or visa versa? I intend to be the bridge between the pride of men of both sides and see we get back the original united Peter Church but heavily governed by church councils as early Apostolic Christianity was. If the Protestants are reforming back to early Apostolic Christianity, then I am the final destination for them. If the two giant Catholic Apostolic founded churches stand for Apostolic Christianity as they claim, then in the end they must consent to the restoration to power of the original Apostolic Constitution which governed all Christianity for the first few hundred years.
     Jesus had a job listing in Chapter 2 in Revelation. I told Jesus the job was now filled and it is time to get the final job done Jesus wants for Christianity. I think Jesus likes my boldness. While others are crying what can we do to save Christianity, I just pick up the script Jesus gave us and say "Let's finish the job now Jesus gave us to do!"
     Pass my Omni Law now like fanatics for Christ. Look up a copy at Nesara News or else ask for a copy from me at email address of fastboomamericaneconomy@gmail.com . Also, funds are welcome so we can steamroll our opposition in America and win America effectively back to Christ. Send checks made out to NIFI and to the address of NIFI, P.O. Box 1465, Seneca, SC 29679 .
     If we have the faith that moves mountains, then we are going to win America back. When I played football, they gave me the nickname of "Guts." When I entered a boxing tournament in military school, soon I had the nickname of "the lion-hearted." I was born with all the guts Christianity needs to storm America now! So soldiers for Christ, what is your excuse now? It is time to storm America and win America for Christ! Yours for God and Country, Eramus of America (pen name briefly. When I hold the winning hand, no need for this pen name any longer! The nation knows that it is rotten in Denmark meaning Wash., D.C. in this case. So let's make America a Christian nation again. Back me seriously and we will storm America now for Christ!)
    

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

This is the best article posted on this site! But most people here on this site want Aliens (demons) to save them, so it will get passed over, very easily.

Anonymous said...

Erasmus, pax tecum!

I always love to read your posts. Your intellectual firework is a great pleasure.

But your theological excursus is something which needs objection. You might be a deep economist nobody will doubt. But your theological expertise has not exposed yourself as deep expert.

All you have written is old hat in theology. More than 30 years ago we had hot discussions during my study at the university, and later I lectured New Testament and patristics to newer generations of students. Are you always that arrogant claiming modern theologians would miss mental power? Maybe in the US, but surely not in Germany...

I respect your experience with texts from the Book of Revelation. Anyway, your reference to hermeneutically questionable events of the 20th century and your recourse to a couple of Church Fathers makes your article not more credible. Maybe your 3 years of Latin is not enough, in Germany it needs at least 5 years by the way becoming an almost comprehensively educated theologian...

But let us not fight over kindergarten stuff. You simply missed to follow the track of apostolicity. You did not mention Paul`s basic interpretation of Jesus`s message, which lead him to a totally different view. You said nothing about Paul`s influence in the question of what is considered apostolic. You simply mixed different Church Fathers without dealing with individual contexts and connotations. You missed to recognize that Paul changed the whole message of Jesus. It was Paul who developed a whole system of redemption. He was not interested in the earthly life of the messenger, but in the title - the Christ. And since the circle around Peter claimed apostolicy from direct dicipleship, Paul introduced the work of a spiritualized Christ being one with the Spirit of God.

Of course, you were a military man and took that model once you looked out for proper leadership. Will you not comfess your deep inner dependency of your way of life forming your style of hermeneutics, your interpretation of Cristianity? Mule, nihil sentis? My view is different! You might have an IQ over 500, but you are 1) a bad theologian, and 2) not God! How dare you taking you as example of careful research on apostolicity? And did you not know by the way of the old crook Jerome, whom you love to take as important witness? Erasnus asinus, please try to soft-pedal!

You have recovered your Omni Law, that is something you can be proud of, and you deserve deep respect for that. But do not get lost in ridiculous arrogance, as if such nonsense is necessary!

Take my greetings from Germany, Mr Erasmus of America!

Tertiusgaudens